Which measure should be implemented to reduce risks for remote users accessing company resources from unauthorized locations?

Geofencing is an effective measure for reducing risks associated with remote users accessing company resources from unauthorized locations. It involves creating virtual geographic boundaries that can set restrictions on where users can access services or data. When a user attempts to connect from outside the designated area, access can be denied or limited, effectively enforcing location-based controls.

This approach can help organizations ensure that sensitive data and applications are only accessible from approved locations, thereby mitigating risks such as unauthorized access or data breaches that might occur if users are connecting from insecure or non-compliant areas. It provides an additional layer of security by combining physical location awareness with access controls.

The other options, while useful in different contexts, do not specifically address the issue of geographical access limitations. A VPN, for instance, secures connections over the internet by creating encrypted tunnels, but it does not inherently restrict access based on location. Auditing is valuable for identifying and monitoring access and behaviors, but it doesn’t prevent unauthorized access proactively. Intrusion signatures help detect and respond to threats but are more focused on recognizing and mitigating attacks rather than controlling access based on location.